ChristianWarrior
    > Charismatics
        > Charismatics, healings, tongues! What a bunch of... ?
New Topic    New Poll    Add Reply

Page 1 2

Next Topic >>
Author
Comment
KJChristianWarrior
ezOP
Posts: 21
(3/20/02 7:26 am)
Reply

Charismatics, healings, tongues! What a bunch of... ?
Do we not get the Spirits blessing, as the church forefathers did? Are we held less then them... or did healings just never happen at all?

RevTim
Unregistered User
(3/20/02 6:38 pm)
Reply

Healings, Tongues, Manifestations, Charismatics, etc.
There has been a lot of confusion and mud-slinging done with this very topic in recent years. Within Pentecostal and Charismatic camps there has been a division between haves and have nots, which has spilled over into the non-charismatic/pentecostal camps. A sort of elitism (thinking they are superior Christians) has driven a wedge between the camps. The truth is, those who have been, what Pentecostals/Charismatics call, baptized in the Holy Spirit are not better Christians, or more blessed than those who have not.

The question is, has this experience stopped. In general terms, the non-Pentecostals suggest that the charismata (sign gifts 1 Cor.12-14) stopped after the completion of the New Testament, or the death of the Apostles. They point to ! Cor. 13:8-10 which states:
"Love never fails; but if there are gifts of prophecy, they will be done away; if there are tongues, they will cease; if there is knowledge, it will be done away. For we know in part and we prophesy in part; but when the perfect comes, the partial will be done away" (NASB). They point to the "perfect" being the completion of the New Testament. The problem is, we still see in part (v 12). It is my contention that the "perfect" to come is when we step into eternity on the flip side of life.

Have the charismata stopped? No, I don't think they have. Did they stop at some point in history? Again my answer would be no. There is ample historical evidence to suggest that throughout church history the charismatic gifts have been evident. I point to Dr. Ron Kydd's (an anglican minister) doctoral thesis (in Church History) which has been published under the title "The Charismatic Gifts of the Early Chruch." Ron Kydd uncovers historical data whcih does suggest that the gifts were present in he church throughout history.

As a Pentecostal minister, it is my belief that all Christians receive the Holy Spirit at conversion. And the non-Charismatics/Pentecostals are just as blessed as the Charismatics/Pentecostals. There are no levels in Christianity.

KJChristianWarrior
ezOP
Posts: 22
(3/20/02 10:14 pm)
Reply

Re: Charismatics, healings, tongues! What a bunch of... ?
RevTim you write (The truth is, those who have been, what Pentecostals/Charismatics call, baptized in the Holy Spirit are not better Christians, or more blessed than those who have not.) Dont know if thats your belief as well?

But to me all Christians are baptized in the Holy Spirit, as one cannot call Christ Lord unless by the Holy Spirit (1 cor 12:30)

1cor 13:8-10 to me anyway it seems to be talking about how we in part, have prophecy, healings and others gifts, but theses will go away when Christ comes, for there will be no need of them.

Benny Hinn, Coperland, Robertson and others claim to have the gift of healing given by the Holy Spirit... and have great followings, filling the seats everywhere they go. A lot of Christians and non believers see them as frauds, making fun of them and the way they look and act, and speak, but doesnt the Lord use what the world deems foolish, at times, to do great works? Many believe in healings and gifts, yet are also the first ones to cast stones at these men, and to me, and knowing how the Lord works, would say that they might be jumping the gun...

RevTim
Unregistered User
(3/20/02 10:56 pm)
Reply

Hinn, Copeland etc.
King.... you write "all Christians are baptized in the Holy Spirit." On this point we differ, in symantics only. All Christians are filled with the Holy Spirit, but as I see things, not all are baptized in the Holy Spirit (which in Pentecostal circles is accompanied by speech in other tongues). The book of Acts shows a pattern of an event which is subsequent to salvation (an event Pentecostals call the Baptism in the Spirit).

Charismatics such as Benny Hinn, Kenneth Copeland, and Pat Roberson Ocaisionally move in the giftings of the Spirit, namely the gifts of healing. In my understanding of the gifts, Christians do not own them, and therefore, the gift is only present when God decides to use it. Hinn and Copeland tend to be "attacked" even by Pentecostals because of their poor thought out theology, which is heretical in places. Hinn for example teaches that the Trinity is composed of no less than nine members (a teaching that got his credentials taken away by the Assemblies of God). Both Hinn and Copeland (among others) also teach that Jesus died spiritually on the cross, taking on the very nature of Satan, and then sufferered for 3 days in Hell, before becoming the first Born Again person (it gets more bizarre after this). Benny is further attacked on the grounds that he is a false prophet. A few years ago Brother Hinn prophesied that all homosexuals would be wiped out from the earth by 1999. Ummmm it hasn't happened. If this were Old Testament times, Hinn would be stoned to death for such a false prophecey.

KJChristianWarrior
ezOP
Posts: 23
(3/21/02 9:36 pm)
Reply

Re: Baptized in the Holy Spirit
RevTim you write (King.... you write "all Christians are baptized in the Holy Spirit." On this point we differ, in semantics only.)

But perhaps we have more difference on this then we think.

KJV 1 Corinitains 12:13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.

Clearly shows to me that the spirit baptizes all, just giving different gifts to each.
Here was have Jesus asking them a question which they took him by surprise by answering yes "If such a thing could occur. They're faith which he taught them had grown enough that they gave the right answer."

KJV Mathew 20:22 But Jesus answered and said, Ye know not what ye ask. Are ye able to drink of the cup that I shall drink of, and to be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with? They say unto him, We are able.

So they are baptize with the same baptismal that our Lord had. But that's them, the 12 -1 (another debate, we'll save itfor now.) Now the question is, are we held back a measure of the same baptismal. I think the answer is no.

KJV Luke 3:16 John answered, saying unto them all, I indeed baptize you with water; but one mightier than I cometh, the latchet of whose shoes I am not worthy to unloose: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost and with fire:

There we have John claiming he cannot baptize, but by water, and Christ will baptize with the Holy Ghost, yet we know that Jesus only baptized the twelve John 4:2 (Though Jesus himself baptized not, but his disciples,) So all else, are in fact baptize by Christ in spirit (The quickening) and he in turn through spirit, baptized us with the Holy Ghost. Of course we are all first baptized by Father for no man comes to Christ but by Father first
John 6:65 And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.
Mathew 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:

KJV Luke 11:13 If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your children: how much more shall your heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to them that ask him?
1cor 12:1 Now concerning spiritual gifts, brethren, I would not have you ignorant.
2 Ye know that ye were Gentiles, carried away unto these dumb idols, even as ye were led.
3 Wherefore I give you to understand, that no man speaking by the Spirit of God calleth Jesus accursed: and that no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost.
4 Now there are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit.
5 And there are differences of administrations, but the same Lord.
6 And there are diversities of operations, but it is the same God which worketh all
7 But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal.
8 For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom; to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit;
9 To another faith by the same Spirit; to another the gifts of healing by the same Spirit;
10 To another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues:
11 But all these worketh that one and the selfsame Spirit, dividing to every man severally as he will (kjv).

Clearly to me at least, that shows that the Holy Spirit gives each man different gifts for different reason. For any Christian to say, because I have spoke in tongues, or heal, therefore I am baptized in the Holy Spirit, and others that have not, are not baptized in the Holy Spirit would be wrong.

As to Hinn and the others, and their theology I haven't read nor know their doctrinal preferences or teaching. I do however know that many Christians label him and others as frauds, or not Christian, and wonder why if this is true, they have such large followings, are all these Christians somehow led astray, and if so what's that say about the gullibility of Christians?

Has Hinn not healed one person, by the gifts of the Holy Spirit, and if not wouldn't this be a keenly observed failure by his critics? And if he has, and does, are others prepared to stand before the judgment seat of Christ, with the slander of a vessel of the Holy Spirit on their soul?











Edited by: KJChristianWarrior at: 3/23/02 3:34:10 pm
RevTim
Unregistered User
(3/23/02 1:48 pm)
Reply

Baptism in Holy Spirit
KingJehu wrote:

But perhaps we have more difference on this then we think.

KJV 1 Corinitains 12:13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.

Clearly shows to me that the spirit baptizes all, just giving different gifts to each.
Here was have Jesus asking them a question which they took him by surprise by answering yes "If such a thing could occur. They're faith which he taught them had grown enough that they gave the right answer."

Tim here:

We are baptised (literally submerged) into the body, however this passage says little, or nothing about the baptism in the Holy Spirit. Clearly in the book of Acts there is an event that takes place after salvation,

"He said to them, "Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?" And they said to him, "No, we have not even heard whether there is a Holy Spirit" (19:2, NASB).

All Christians receive the indwelling of the Holy Spirit at conversion, yet these believers haven't received the Holy Spirit. What is Paul asking here then? They had not yet been baptized in the Holy Spirit. Paul later lays hands on them and they received, with tongues speech in evidence (see also Acts 10:46-47). Peter's statement in verse 47 indicates that he believed that the baptism was accompanied by speaking in other tongues.

King wrote again:

KJV Mathew 20:22 But Jesus answered and said, Ye know not what ye ask. Are ye able to drink of the cup that I shall drink of, and to be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with? They say unto him, We are able.

So they are baptize with the same baptismal that our Lord had.

Yes, but there is no scripture that indicates Jesus wasever baptized in the Holy Spirit. Scripture does say He was full of the Holy Spirit, and anointed bt the Holy Spirit, but does not say He was baptized in the Spirit. Incedently the Greek text in Matthew does not mention baptism at all. The passage ends with the drinking of the same cup. The context is clear that Jesus here is referring to the coming suffering He was about to endure, which incedently the disciples all went through a cup and yes a baptism of suffering (of sorts). The baptism reference is included in the Mark account (10:35-45) and was likely an interploration in the TR in the Matthew account, which is why it appears in the kjv and not in other translations. Commentators and context indicate that the baptism is a reference to the coming suffering that Jesus is about to endure.

the John 6 passage refers to the Spirit drawing, or calling men/women to repentance and faith in Jesus Christ (no baptism here).

The Matthew 28 passage, commonly referred to as the Great Commission, is a model of baptism (water) that is to be followed.

The Luke 11 passage regarding the Father giving the Holy Spirit, is talking about regeneration/conversion when all believers receive the Holy Spirit (again, this is not a reference to the baptism).

Tongues speech, evidenced in Acts 2:4, Acts 10:46, and Acts 19:6 all at what was clearly referred to the baptsim of the Holy Spirit is what Pentecostals call "glossolalia." It is different from the gift of tongues refered to in 1 Cor 12-14, which dealt with the public utterance of tongues. Paul himself made the claim that he spoke in tongues more than anyone else (1 Cor 14:18) .

Regarding Benny Hinn, to my knowledge there has been not one confirmed case (medically) of a healing taking place in is crusades (I could be wrong here). He does encourage those who have been "touched" by the Holy Spirit to get medical verification that they no longer need to take their medicine, etc. I do not doubt for a minute that Benny Hinn has been used by the Lord from time to time. Benny in his meetings does point to Christ and the need for salvation. I, however, will not cross the street to go to one of his meetings.

KJChristianWarrior
ezOP
Posts: 26
(3/23/02 3:34 pm)
Reply

Re: Baptism in Holy Spirit
Tim you write: We are baptised (literally submerged) into the body, however this passage says little, or nothing about the baptism in the Holy Spirit. Clearly in the book of Acts there is an event that takes place after salvation,

Re: Talking of (KJV 1 Corinitains 12:13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.) But to me it says volumes, meaning one measure is not given to another, above another, at the initial 'quickening' and that God finds favor with one by his faith, and His blessing are bestowed by faith in Him and each measure given though different is not above another.

i.e. Tongues is no more a sign God favors one above another, then say the gift of charity, nor no more a sign one is baptized in the holy spirit and the other isn't. And what shows more diligence in the spirit, tongues or one that can't keep from giving 'you know the type, so filled they are a blessing and a light in everybody's life, and never get weary of charity of time or goods'

Tim you write: Tongues speech, evidenced in Acts 2:4, Acts 10:46, and Acts 19:6 all at what was clearly referred to the baptsim of the Holy Spirit is what Pentecostals call "glossolalia." It is different from the gift of tongues refered to in 1 Cor 12-14, which dealt with the public utterance of tongues. Paul himself made the claim that he spoke in tongues more than anyone else (1 Cor 14:1

Re: Yet Paul says this. 1 Corinitains 14:4 He that speaketh in an unknown tongue edifieth himself; but he that prophesieth edifieth the church.
5 I would that ye all spake with tongues but rather that ye prophesied: for greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues, except he interpret, that the church may receive edifying.
6 Now, brethren, if I come unto you speaking with tongues, what shall I profit you, except I shall speak to you either by revelation, or by knowledge, or by prophesying, or by doctrine?
7 And even things without life giving sound, whether pipe or harp, except they give a distinction in the sounds, how shall it be known what is piped or harped? (Clearly showing other things are preferred)

Also:
1 Corinitains 14:18 I thank my God, I speak with tongues more than ye all:
19 Yet in the church I had rather speak five words with my understanding, that by my voice I might teach others also, than ten thousand words in an unknown tongue.

And note:
KJV 1 Corinitains 14:5 I would that ye all spake with tongues but rather that ye prophesied: for greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues, except he interpret, that the church may receive edifying.

And note: 1 Corinitains 12:5 And there are differences of administrations, but the same Lord.
6 And there are diversities of operations, but it is the same God which worketh all in all.
7 But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal.
8 For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom; to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit;
9 To another faith by the same Spirit; to another the gifts of healing by the same Spirit;
11 But all these worketh that one and the selfsame Spirit, dividing to every man severally as he will.
12 For as the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body: so also is Christ.

also note:
1 Corinitains 12:22 Nay, much more those members of the body, which seem to be more feeble, are necessary:
23 And those members of the body, which we think to be less honourable, upon these we bestow more abundant honour; and our uncomely parts have more abundant comeliness.
24 For our comely parts have no need: but God hath tempered the body together, having given more abundant honour to that part which lacked.
25 That there should be no schism in the body; but that the members should have the same care one for another.
26 And whether one member suffer, all the members suffer with it; or one member be honoured, all the members rejoice with it.
27 Now ye are the body of Christ, and members in particular.
28 And God hath set some in the church, first apostles, secondarily prophets, thirdly teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, governments, diversities of tongues.
29 Are all apostles? are all prophets? are all teachers? are all workers of miracles?
30 Have all the gifts of healing? do all speak with tongues? do all interpret?
31 But covet earnestly the best gifts: and yet shew I unto you a more excellent way.

Clearly at least to me, shows one is not held above another.

Tim you write: It is different from the gift of tongues refered to in 1 Cor 12-14, which dealt with the public utterance of tongues.

Re: But it is Paul saying do this in private, talking of them that were doing it in the Church. There are two kinds of tongues, one I which the speaker is talking to God Himself. And to on that must be accompanied by an decipher, both are by the same spirit and means and in fact the later is held above the former if anything. For one edifies communication to a whole and the former to just one.

So to me at least, to say that one that speaks in tongues is baptized in the Holy Spirit, and one that doesn't, isn't baptized in the Holy Spirit, would be wrong. For the word shows that Paul himself wished to be able to speak words that were understood, and two that many other things where held in higher esteem by him. for both him and others :)

Daaaaa King

KJChristianWarrior
ezOP
Posts: 28
(3/23/02 3:43 pm)
Reply

Re: Benny Hinn
I was not expecting this response but more or stoning party for the heretic Hinn, so now I will go one further, you say Hinn has been used by God to do things, yet we all know God even uses the wick for His will. Do you count Benny as your brother in Christ though?

Daaaaa King

MonkeeSage
Registered User
Posts: 16
(3/24/02 3:56 am)
Reply

Just something to note in passing...
The belief that various spiritual gifts have stopped; for example the gift of public prophecy, etc.; as they fulfilled their purpose in history, is one possibility that wasn't really touched on. Of faith, hope and love, the three cardinal graces, even faith and hope will some day become complete and fulfill their purpose and then pass away, then we will see clearly, and not through this dim glass, and only love will remain. It is not inconcievable to think that the other graces and gifts have a historical function and will eventually pass away as God kingdom on earth progresses.

In any case, one example of a misapplication of a charismata is the idea that glossia, speaking in tongues, is a sign for believers, when Paul specifically said that its purpose is/was for a sign to unbelievers. Would the modern spectacle of people with their heads tucked in their arm on the prayer rail suddenly blurting uninterpreted gibberish as a "sign of the second blessing," fit the apostolic criterion, or would this verse fit better?

1Co 14:23 If, therefore, the whole church assembles and all speak in tongues, and outsiders or unbelievers enter, will they not say that you are mad? (Cf. Vss. 8-23)

Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not going to tell someone who believes they can speak in tongues that they cannot, I wouldn't want to `revile the leader of the people,' so to speak, if God has blessed them with that gift, then I trust He will use it to His glory. I just suggest that we be very careful and test every spirit and bring every thought into the captivity of Christ, in obedience to His Word, as He gives us strength. :)

-J

S.D.G.

iHs
Registered User
Posts: 2
(3/29/02 7:29 pm)
Reply

Re: Just something to note in passing...
I shall first state that I do not necessarily hold that the gifts have ceased. Nor do I hold that posession and or use of specific gifts are litmus tests to salvation, or baptism of the Holy Ghost.

It seems to me we simply need to define what the gifts are. I will ask this of 'tongues'. We first hear of this gift in Acts 2. I will post the KJV w/strongs, along with an easier translation;

MKJV
Act 2:6 But this sound occurring, the multitude came together and were confounded, because they each heard them speaking in his own dialect.
Act 2:7 And they were all amazed and marveled, saying to one another, Behold, are not these who speak all Galileans?
Act 2:8 And how do we each hear in our own dialect in which we were born?

Act 2:6 Now1161 when this5026 was1096 noised abroad5456, the multitude4128 came together4905, and2532 were confounded4797, because3754 that every1538 man1520 heard191 them846 speak2980 in his own2398 language1258. was...: Gr. voice was made confounded: or, troubled in mind
Act 2:7 And1161 they were1839, 0 all3956 amazed1839 and2532 marvelled2296, saying3004 one to another4314, 240, Behold2400, are1526 not3756 all3956 these3778 which3588 speak2980 Galilaeans1057?
Act 2:8 And2532 how4459 hear191 we2249 every1538 man in our2257 own2398 tongue1258, wherein1722, 3739 we were born1080?

I have been to many charismatic services. My mother is an ordained pentecostal minister. My step brother has a pentecostal church. While I have heard what people call 'tongues', I am unsure about the interpretation used by many.

Strongs says this about the Greek meanings;

5456 - Greek
5456 phone fo-nay'
probably akin to 5316 through the idea of disclosure; a tone (articulate, bestial or artificial); by implication, an address (for any purpose), saying or language:--noise, sound, voice.

2980 laleo lal-eh'-o
a prolonged form of an otherwise obsolete verb; to talk, i.e. utter words:--preach, say, speak (after), talk, tell, utter. Compare 3004.

1258 - Greek
1258 dialektos dee-al'-ek-tos
from 1256; a (mode of) discourse, i.e. "dialect":--language, tongue.

1100 - Greek
1100 glossa gloce-sah'
of uncertain affinity; the tongue; by implication, a language (specially, one naturally unacquired):--tongue.

Which definition is correct? The definition held by a sect started in the early 1900's, or the interpretation handed down by orthodoxy? What other interpretation is valid?

RevTim
Unregistered User
(3/29/02 11:48 pm)
Reply

Litmus test
No one has said that tongues are the litmus test for salvation, or the Baptism of the Holy Spirit. I do argue that tongues are the inital physical evidence of the Baptism of the Holy Spirit.

soundoff
Unregistered User
(3/30/02 1:00 am)
Reply

Baptism in the Holy Spirit
I want to mention that this topic and document is written in 7th - 8th reading level according to the USA education standards. I do this so that all can easily understand. Especially for those who have a reading problem but still enjoy reading about our Lord and Saviour.

Are All Baptized In The Holy Spirit?

I have read many competent arguments on this site about the Holy Spirit and whom He baptizes in the Body of Christ.

I have a one goal in this post and that is to stay focus on one part of the many arguments that have been given in here about tongues and baptism and how they conjoin and correlate with one another.

It is my desire to add some insight to these posts that might ameliorate and alleviate the many enigmas concerning the doctrine of baptism. It is also my desire to take the approach with the single eye and not favor some type of doctrinal position from some other authority other than the Bible. It is my desire that I try to be as explicit as I can be with this subject matter.

I understand how the Pentecost’s deals with this teaching and how many others have dealt with such matters. My main point is in one targeted area and this is the "Spiritual Baptism" done by the Holy Spirit. I will try to remain focus in this area to the best of my abilities.

The Baptism of the Holy Spirit as we know is a biblical piece of information.

John 1:33 And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost.

AND:

Mat 3:11 I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire:

These two verses shows us that the Holy Spirit does baptize but the question is how did baptism by the Holy Spirit take place and what by what disciplinary measures did the Holy Spirit follow?

The sequence of how one was baptized by the Holy Spirit for the Body of Christ in the first century differentiates from how we see many domestic teachings that leads to much confusion and obscurity.

First of all we see that the Apostles had to lay his hands on the disciples who were just baptized in the name of Jesus.

Act 19:6 And when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Ghost came on them; and they spake with tongues, and prophesied.

I use this scripture to show that at first when the Holy Spirit was to baptize a new convert it was done only in the presence of an Apostle by the laying of hands.

Lets take another verse to point this matter out.

Act 19:2 He said unto them, Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? And they said unto him, We have not so much as heard whether there be any Holy Ghost.

We can see that these were believers but they never had experienced the Holy Spirits baptism. They were John's disciples and believers in Jesus. Being John's disciples we know that they would have learned from John about the Holy Spirit since John did preach about the Holy Spirit. But like Simon they never received the Holy Spirit Baptism and knew nothing about it.

We also know that they were believers since Paul asked have you received the Holy Spirit since you believed?

During this dispensation the Holy Spirit did not baptize one into the Body of Christ by just any believer or by any preacher and any evangelist.

We can see this because John was not given the authorization to Baptize but by water.

In the next two verses we can see once again that the baptism in Jesus name (Father, Son & HS) was not enough until the apostles laid hands upon the newly converts. As in the above verses that I have posted it shows Paul baptizing them first and then laying of the hands upon the Disciples of Christ for their baptism.

Act 8:14 Now when the apostles which were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent unto them Peter and John:

Act 8:15 Who, when they were come down, prayed for them, that they might receive the Holy Ghost:

Act 8:16 (For as yet he was fallen upon none of them: only they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.)

We can see then in this next verse that my point is backed up.

Act 8:17 Then laid they their hands on them, and they received the Holy Ghost. The apostles had to be sent for in order for people to receive the Baptism of the Holy Spirit.

Then in the next verse I will post we will see that the HS through Philips preaching saved Simon but Philip never was able part the HS to Simon.

This is why Simon wanted this power when He seen what Peter had done. Simon thought he could buy this HS and he realized he never had the baptism of the HS.

As we read in the next verse about Simon:
Act 8:18 And when Simon saw that through laying on of the apostles' hands the Holy Ghost was given, he offered them money,

Act 8:19 Saying, Give me also this power, that on whomsoever I lay hands, he may receive the Holy Ghost.

We can see that the Holy Spirit baptism at first had to be through the Apostles by the laying of hands. We do know that Peter preached the gospel on the day of Pentecost and people were baptized in the HS. This was done by the ones in the upper room as well. We can see that it became different when the gospel was preached after the Great Pentecostal Day.

Later on a change took place and when Peter preached to the centurion he noticed that the Holy Spirit did not wait for him to lay hands on the centurion but the Holy Spirit baptized the centurion without the aid of Peters hands.

We can perceive here that God first started building upon the foundation that Jesus had built. God only built upon the foundation that Jesus had built by the builders of Christ and through His name only. This is where no man or nation or power of any kind could help or claim to build the church of God but by the Apostles.

This was done on purpose and showed that God built upon the foundation by His own Apostles and that no man can claim that he knows God and that they are just as much as being a part of God as the Christians are.

We can see that the Baptism changed by one just believing in Christ and not having to wait any longer for an Apostle. The reason for this God knew that the Apostles would die one day. He also states in Revelation that the NT church is built by the Apostles on the foundation of Christ.

We can observe in this next verse:

Act 10:44 While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word.

Act 10:45 And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost.

This shocked them because Peter did not have to lay his hands upon anyone and while he yet spoke the Holy Ghost fell upon them.

We can comprehend that one must be baptized now in the body of Christ to be a child of Christ.

1Co 12:13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.

This is talking about every child of God being spiritually baptized by the Holy Spirit. It cannot be argued that this is some other form of baptism. This is done by one Spirit and is not talking about water baptism. The reason is it is not water baptism that puts us into the Body of Christ.

It says we are all baptized into one body... Notice that there are not two bodies? One for the non-baptized Christians and one for the HS baptized Christians. We are all baptized and by this it is meant we are baptized upon the conversion of the believer.

The verse says we must be baptized into the body.... otherwise we cannot be in the body.

We can observe that there is no other example in the bible after Peter's experience with the Centurion to be baptized in any other way. The Centurion was a believer but he never received the HS but at this time the Centurion did receive the baptism of the HS and Peter did not lay hands upon him.

This was the beginning of a new era for the Baptism of the Holy Spirit who did not need the Apostles any more.

We can see that those who were with the Centurion also were baptized in the HS by hearing the word of God.


It was not by hearing Peters preaching that caused the baptism of the HS but it was the divine appointment by the HS who baptized them. It is done according to Gods own good will and pleasure. We also see that Jesus preached that the HS would go where He is listed to go in KJV John 3, when it concerns the works of His Spirit.

When we see that one received the HS we can see that they are automatically baptized. Baptism in the HS is a spiritual immersion. One cannot be in the /body of Christ without the baptism of the HS. It is by His Spirit that we are baptized into the body of Christ.

Rom 8:9 But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.

We do not have any example that shows us in the bible that people did seek for the baptism of the Holy Spirit while others got it. We do not see where the Holy Spirit had people seek His baptism by prayer and by other means as they do in domestic religions. It is a fallacy that one must seek for a gift to have evidence of the Baptism of the Holy Spirit.

We do not see where the Christians were told to seek such a thing. It has been injected that one must seek and search for the baptism of the Holy Spirit. Yet the bible shows just the opposite. They believed and were immediately baptized by the Holy Spirit as shown above.

If gifts were the evidence of the Holy Spirits Baptism then those prophets in the OT could declare they had the HS baptism because the HS did speak through them as prophets.

It is the baptism of the HS that puts us into the Body of Christ. He literally immerses us with His Spirit as if one is baptized by water in the full immersion method.

This is similar to being baptized into Christ and putting on Christ as Paul explained. We are factually put into the Body of Christ by Baptism.

One thing I might enhance before I close, and this would be that we must realize that God had to start with the Apostles to part the Holy Spirit so that this would be a form of evidence that not just anyone can start this religion upon the foundation of Jesus Christ our Lord.

JaRay







iHs
Registered User
Posts: 5
(3/30/02 8:17 am)
Reply

Re: Baptism in the Holy Spirit
Would you please show me scripturally where any gift is the litmus test for baptism by the Holy Spirit?

Litmus test

No one has said that tongues are the litmus test for salvation, or the Baptism of the Holy Spirit. I do argue that tongues are the initial physical evidence of the Baptism of the Holy Spirit.

You contradict yourself.

Also, nobody has addressed my original concern.

Which definition of tongues do i follow?

MonkeeSage
Registered User
Posts: 65
(3/31/02 4:54 pm)
Reply

Re: Baptism in the Holy Spirit
1 Cor. 7:7 Yet I would that all men were even as I myself. Howbeit each man hath his own gift from God, one after this manner, and another after that. (ASV)

idion carisma ek [or, echei] qeou
his own gift from God

We don't tend to think of being married and unmarried as "Charismatic" gifts--we tend to think of them as secondary classifications of people that may have nothing to do with their Christian walk--but it seems that Paul didn't see them that way at all, as he is speaking of marriage in this passage.

In another sense he may be saying; because the Spirit has given gifts (charismata), each one, suited to His purposes for us, that we must each decide for ourselves in the issue of marriage.

In any case, choosing one charisma to be identified as the "first" or even identified as a sureity (i.e. promise) to everyone who has been empowered by the Spirit (Acts 1:8), looks to be in error to me. Not all are apostles, not all are teachers, not all are ministers, not all speak in tongues, etc., etc. but all true believers "have been granted...all things that pertain unto life and godliness" (1 Peter 1:3), for their Christian walk.

-J

S.D.G

TopHat
Unregistered User
(4/2/02 1:40 pm)
Reply

Tongues
I wish I could stay longer and write more but work is calling me but I would like to say one thing about how I feel about tongues.

I am not going to say anything against tongues but I will say this in all my days of missionary work and working with many different churches and revivals I have never seen one church to my recollection that practiced them correctly.

What I am saying is this, no church or body of Christ seemed to follow the rules that Paul spoke of in his Epistle. Many would speak in tongues and many times no one was interpreting them. When they did interpret them it was not done according to how Paul said it should be done.

I remember when one did interpret a tongue speaker they said that God said this and that and the people praised God. The problem was it was said in Spanish and the tongue speaker was cursing God and cussing him out.

If tongues is true then I would love to see it done once in the correct manner and see the hogwash thrown out.

I don't think that is asking for too much........

TopHat

MonkeeSage
Registered User
Posts: 90
(4/2/02 2:18 pm)
Reply

Re: Tongues
Well bro, in a sense Churches are communities, they are our cliques, and the same way you see all the kids start to dress the same way when a certain style of dress becomes the precedent, or certain people in a congregation stand and "sort-of-sing" because everyone else there is singing; when you tell people they are missing out on all the fulness of God's plan for them and only have a partial blessing untill they demonstrate the full blessing by X, Y or Z...then everyone else starts demonstrating their full blessings....those people are gonna start demonstrating it one way or another (generally speaking), as a psychological fact.

That's one of the main practical (pragmatic) problems I see with the second blessing theology, the "sign" of the second blessing is most often (mis-)taken (among second blessing laity, at least) as the means of obtaining it--so not only do you end up with people in the pews thinking something is wrong with them--they don't have enough faith, they aren't really saved, or God is angry at them, etc. etc.--but you have them trying to force some expected fuller blessing/right standing with God/vindicate their salvation (or faith) by forcing themselves to speak in "tongues".....results? the chaos you have observed...

my two-cents.

-J

S.D.G

WholeAgainNBTB
Registered User
Posts: 5
(5/2/02 10:30 am)
Reply

Re: Baptism in Holy Spirit
Acts 2
1 When the day of Pentecost had come, they were all together in one place.
2 And suddenly a sound came from heaven like the rush of a mighty wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitting.
3 And there appeared to them tongues as of fire, distributed and resting on each one of them.
4 And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.
2:4 Or languages; also in verse 11
11(both Jews and converts to Judaism); Cretans and Arabs--we hear them declaring the wonders of God in our own tongues!"
The belief among most Pentecostal groups about "speaking in tongues" is that the "tongue" is an extremely spiritual utterance in a language of the Holy Spirit that cannot be understood by common man. However, when we really look at this Scripture, the very one that teaching is most derived from, we find that the believers weren't speaking in some special language that no one could understand! We find that they were, in fact, testifying aloud in the languages of all those present that they might hear and understand... and THIS they did through the power of the Holy Spirit because they didn't even know those languages!
SO, if the "gift of tongues" IS a special language given by the Holy Spirit, then the Bible declares that the Cretans and Arabs HAD THAT GIFT when they didn't even HAVE THE SPIRIT... In which case, the Bible contradicts itself quite clearly within 7 verses of itself.

KJChristianWarrior  
ezOP
Posts: 505
(5/3/02 8:14 pm)
Reply

Re: Baptism in Holy Spirit
Ummm they were ALL Christians though... he is just naming what regions the Christians were from that were speaking in tongues... and Cretans means those Christians from Crete by the way and not "Pagans" per say...

Blessing, KingJehu. ChristianWarrior

fleshNblood
Registered User
Posts: 58
(5/4/02 7:40 am)
Reply

Re: Baptism in Holy Spirit
The Bible is the Word of God, and God does not lie.

Ask the Holy Spirit to show you where you have erred in your interpretation.

Peace and Love in Jesus!

WholeAgainNBTB
Registered User
Posts: 7
(5/7/02 8:34 pm)
Reply

Re: Baptism in Holy Spirit
I think you misunderstood what I meant.
I mean that "tongues" DOES mean "other languages" because otherwise there would be a contradiction, and I don't believe the Bible has those.

KJChristianWarrior  
ezOP
Posts: 526
(5/9/02 3:40 pm)
Reply

Re: Baptism in Holy Spirit
Oh okay yes... at that one time the tongues where in different languages, but I think this was more a sign to them and the more importantly a sign to those non-believers. I agree, and sorry for the misunderstanding.

Blessing, KingJehu. ChristianWarrior

Page 1 2 Next Topic >>

Add Reply

Email This To a Friend Email This To a Friend
Topic Control Image Topic Commands
Click to receive email notification of replies Click to receive email notification of replies
Click to stop receiving email notification of replies Click to stop receiving email notification of replies
jump to:

- ChristianWarrior - Charismatics - http://www.angelfire.com/realm2/warrior2/ -

Powered By ezboard® Ver. 7.32
Copyright ©1999-2007 ezboard, Inc.